Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Supporters of Assange
Supporters of the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, outside the Old Bailey during his extradition hearing on Monday. Photograph: Matt Dunham/AP
Supporters of the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, outside the Old Bailey during his extradition hearing on Monday. Photograph: Matt Dunham/AP

Vietnam war leaker Daniel Ellsberg warns against extraditing Julian Assange

This article is more than 3 years old

Pentagon Papers whistleblower tells extradition hearing WikiLeaks founder won’t get a fair trial in the US

The man who leaked the Pentagon Papers about the Vietnam war has defended Julian Assange at his London extradition hearing on Wednesday, saying WikiLeaks had acted in the public interest and warned that its founder would not get a fair trial in the United States.

Australian-born Assange, 49, is fighting efforts to send him to the United States, where he is charged with conspiring to hack government computers and violating an espionage law over the release of confidential cables by WikiLeaks in 2010-2011.

Daniel Ellsberg (l) in 1973 during his trial. Photograph: AP

Daniel Ellsberg, who in 1971 leaked documents known as the Pentagon Papers to the New York Times and other news outlets, told the court that WikiLeaks’ disclosures had shown Americans how they had been misled about US action in Iraq and Afghanistan just as his leaks, which also revealed previously secret information, did about the Vietnam War.

Ellsberg cited a US military video, which WikiLeaks published in 2010 under the title “Collateral Murder”, showing a 2007 attack by Apache helicopters in Baghdad that killed a dozen people, including two Reuters news staff.

“I was acutely aware that what was depicted in that video deserved the term murder, a war crime,” he told London’s Old Bailey court via videolink. “I was very glad that the American public was confronted with this reality of our war.”

James Lewis, the lawyer representing the US authorities, said Assange was not wanted for publishing the 2007 video, but for disclosing a small number of documents with the unredacted names of sources or informants.

Lewis said many of these had suffered harm or threats because they had been named. He said some had disappeared, although he conceded that there was no evidence that this was directly linked to WikiLeaks’ publication.

“How can you possibly say … that there is no evidence that Mr Assange’s publication of WikiLeaks put anyone in danger? That’s just pure nonsense,” Lewis said.

Ellsberg, who was himself charged with breaking the espionage law in a case that was later dismissed, said there was no evidence of physical harm or deaths because of the leaks. The exchange with Lewis led to an outburst from Assange in the courtroom, and the judge warned him to remain silent.

Earlier, John Goetz, an investigative reporter who worked for Germany’s Der Spiegel magazine on the first publication of the documents in 2010, said Assange was careful to ensure that the names of informants in hundreds of thousands of leaked secret US government documents were never published.

Goetz said WikiLeaks was frustrated when a password that allowed access to the full, unredacted material was published in a book by Guardian reporters in February 2011.

Assange’s lawyers argue that he would not receive a fair trial in the United States and that the charges are politically motivated. They have also said he would be a suicide risk if sent to the United States, where they say he could be sentenced to 175 years in prison.

In 2012, Assange took refuge in Ecuador’s London embassy to avoid extradition to Sweden, where he was accused of sex crimes. He always denied the accusations and the investigation was later dropped. After seven years, he was dragged from the embassy by British police in 2019 and then jailed for skipping bail related to the Swedish case. He has remained in prison ever since.

This article was amended on 5 October 2020 to clarify that Julian Assange was not charged with sex crimes, as an earlier version said. He had faced allegations, which he denied, and the investigations were later dropped.

More on this story

More on this story

  • Julian Assange wins temporary reprieve in case against extradition to US

  • Julian Assange extradition appeal: what you need to know before the UK high court’s ruling

  • The Guardian view on Julian Assange: why he should not be extradited

  • US government lawyers deny charges against Julian Assange politically motivated

  • Julian Assange: key dates in the WikiLeaks founder's case

  • Julian Assange risks ‘flagrant denial of justice’ if tried in US, London court told

  • Julian Assange supporters gather outside court as extradition hearing starts

  • We have seen Assange’s plight in a UK prison, but extraditing him this week would be a disaster for us all

  • Julian Assange to find out next week if he can appeal against extradition to US

Most viewed

Most viewed